Summary
- The expected strong bond returns within a traditional 60/40 portfolio are unlikely in our current low yield environment.
- Investors should consider incorporating alternatives into their portfolios for optimum diversification.
- BMO Global Asset Management recommends compiling a complementary blend of active alternative managers and multi-alternative strategies.
As we move further away from the Great Recession, the traditional 60/40 portfolio faces headwinds. This much-used paradigm allocates 60 percent of a portfolio to equities and 40 percent to bonds, balancing over the long term the growth (and higher risk) associated with equities with the stability (and lower risk) associated with bonds. Yet a significant assumption within the 60/40 paradigm - historically strong bond returns with low volatility - is no longer realistic with low bond yields in the current environment. We expect that even moderately risky balanced portfolios should expect more than a four percent decrease in returns over the next 10 years compared to what a 60/40 portfolio delivered in the last 35 years.
Investors need to find a way to adapt, as doing nothing may result in missing one's diversification objectives. Assuming lower returns, greater risk or reduced liquidity are unsatisfactory options; a plan to find new sources of return should involve choosing from a spectrum of alternative options, noting these should provide either a higher return for the same amount of risk or the same return for a lower amount of risk.
To meet these diversification challenges, investors will need to distinguish liquid alternative strategies that rely on new market exposure, such as volatility and frontier markets, and those that rely on manager skill, such as market neutral, 130/30, long/short equity and macro strategies. Here it is important to note that many "new market exposures" may already appear in investors' portfolios via REITs and commodities. The difficulty of finding truly new exposures, then, encourages a longer look at active management.
Our research indicates best practice may be to compile a complementary blend of active alternative managers specializing in different strategies, thus creating a multi-alternative fund. Manager selection in the alternatives space is arguably more difficult than in traditional long-only strategies. As evidence of this, we have found the dispersion of returns among several categories within the alternative space is greater than that of long-only funds. More importantly, we believe such dispersion among alternative managers suggests diverse sources of alpha: Alternative managers generate alpha using very different skill sets.
When conducting due diligence, it's important to take sources of differentiation into account in regard to strategy, performance, risk management, organization and structure, among other items. To avoid diluting the contribution of an individual manager, we recommend a pool of six to 10 underlying managers while evenly distributing allocation to each one.
A multi-alternative fund can offer access to a concentrated portfolio of alternative managers, combining front-end due diligence, portfolio construction and management, and risk oversight, all performed by experienced, professional managers. The built-in diversification of multi-alternative approaches helps answer the fundamental question that began the search process in the first place: Is the portfolio diversified by manager and strategy? In short, an alternative allocation that combines expertise on manager research, asset allocation, portfolio construction and risk management should offer a flexible, portfolio-ready option. - seekingalpha
About BMO Global Asset Management
BMO Global Asset Management is a global investment manager delivering service excellence from 27 offices in 17 countries to clients across five continents. Including discretionary and nondiscretionary assets, BMO Global Asset Management had CDN $304 billion in assets under management as of January 31, 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment